Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

new to k20

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Jingers View Post
    they dont make what? im pretty sure js racing makes it for dc2r

    edit :: oh u mean 70RR alone
    Yeah, though T1R makes a 70mm Exhaust for DC2R, it's starting to get common to see 70mm Exhausts for DC5R/K20A platform and F20C's, though I wouldn't go that far unless I was at the point of trying to extract what ever I could from the engine (hardcore tuning)

    I would give it a go for experience sake!
    Last edited by euGeR; 04-09-06, 06:57 PM. Reason: for additional variables.
    ..:: Disciple of the DDang Driving School :: ..
    - Don't rev at me, I get scared -

    Comment


      #17
      3inches netted me a loss of 15kws in the low to mid below 5,500 rpms from a 2.5 inch exhaust. i gained 4 kws at the top end after 5,750...big whoop, ive lost so much to gain a peak of 4kws.

      Im going back to a 2.5 inch when i complete the euro1 on the dc5.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by freakie View Post
        3inches netted me a loss of 15kws in the low to mid below 5,500 rpms from a 2.5 inch exhaust. i gained 4 kws at the top end after 5,750...big whoop, ive lost so much to gain a peak of 4kws.

        Im going back to a 2.5 inch when i complete the euro1 on the dc5.
        hey freakie can u list your mods for us? and did u have it retuned?
        almost JDM spec, y0!

        Comment


          #19
          here ya goes.... some resultz... now i want an RBC intake manifold and custom throttle body and 3" exhaust... omg, there goes my home deposit haha

          http://www.k20a.org/forum/showthread...545#post143545
          almost JDM spec, y0!

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by freakie View Post
            3inches netted me a loss of 15kws in the low to mid below 5,500 rpms from a 2.5 inch exhaust. i gained 4 kws at the top end after 5,750...big whoop, ive lost so much to gain a peak of 4kws.

            Im going back to a 2.5 inch when i complete the euro1 on the dc5.
            That is exactly what I'm talking about.
            No doubt a 3" system will get you better 'peak power' than a 2.5" system.
            But you sacrifice low-mid range for that better peak power.

            If it was a track only car, then yeah. 3" might be better as you'd want to be over 5,000rpm most of the time.

            I guess horses for courses.
            happyhong says:
            aus only have 3 r
            happyhong says:
            civic R, integra R and jonnieR

            Comment


              #21
              nices choice mate! DC5 FTW
              So Hot & Deadly

              Comment


                #22
                just from reading this thread, not the rest of the info, a 3inch exhaust could be put in the same boat as the Injen CAI compared to mugen intake. it gives you peak power gains but losses in mid range which for a street car is prolly not much use

                Comment


                  #23
                  umm.......3 inch is a bit bigger.....aint it?????
                  stock is 2 and a 1/4, right?
                  Team Misplaced CT9A Owner #005

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by scheung View Post
                    umm.......3 inch is a bit bigger.....aint it?????
                    stock is 2 and a 1/4, right?
                    what point are you trying to make? because I don't get it
                    happyhong says:
                    aus only have 3 r
                    happyhong says:
                    civic R, integra R and jonnieR

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by matt View Post
                      just from reading this thread, not the rest of the info, a 3inch exhaust could be put in the same boat as the Injen CAI compared to mugen intake. it gives you peak power gains but losses in mid range which for a street car is prolly not much use
                      i suggest u read the other info.
                      almost JDM spec, y0!

                      Comment


                        #26
                        i also remember i think from crsx along time ago that hondata dude said he put on a custom 3 inch exhast and the gain was > anything out there....too bad it's all pruned

                        z10 says:
                        i bet you will have 10000 wheels when you are done
                        z10 says:
                        mon-fri 9am-5pm chasing for jazz parts

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the attributed gains significantly controlled by what the ECU feeds it? Without relevant core modifications as I've stated, this isn't going to be a blistering change.

                          Your usual I/H/E applicants need not apply, we're measuring advance NA tuning for specific purpose. Heck, the rule of bigger the better does apply on exhausts which everyone knows but it isn't the blanket tuning headlines.

                          How many people can drive a full 3 inch or larger pipe and safely say it's definitely worth it for that "5-8kW" increase from running a smaller pipe? AFAIK, my full 3 inch measured in at close to 130dB on the full titanium. That is as loud if not louder than a 747 at full throttle take off and even I have hesitations carrying this machine out of the garage unless absolutely necessary.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Noel View Post
                            Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the attributed gains significantly controlled by what the ECU feeds it? Without relevant core modifications as I've stated, this isn't going to be a blistering change.

                            Your usual I/H/E applicants need not apply, we're measuring advance NA tuning for specific purpose. Heck, the rule of bigger the better does apply on exhausts which everyone knows but it isn't the blanket tuning headlines.

                            How many people can drive a full 3 inch or larger pipe and safely say it's definitely worth it for that "5-8kW" increase from running a smaller pipe? AFAIK, my full 3 inch measured in at close to 130dB on the full titanium. That is as loud if not louder than a 747 at full throttle take off and even I have hesitations carrying this machine out of the garage unless absolutely necessary.
                            Damn...I wanna hear it now....but maybe when I get some ear muffs
                            happyhong says:
                            aus only have 3 r
                            happyhong says:
                            civic R, integra R and jonnieR

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by Noel View Post
                              Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't the attributed gains significantly controlled by what the ECU feeds it? Without relevant core modifications as I've stated, this isn't going to be a blistering change.

                              Your usual I/H/E applicants need not apply, we're measuring advance NA tuning for specific purpose. Heck, the rule of bigger the better does apply on exhausts which everyone knows but it isn't the blanket tuning headlines.

                              How many people can drive a full 3 inch or larger pipe and safely say it's definitely worth it for that "5-8kW" increase from running a smaller pipe? AFAIK, my full 3 inch measured in at close to 130dB on the full titanium. That is as loud if not louder than a 747 at full throttle take off and even I have hesitations carrying this machine out of the garage unless absolutely necessary.
                              i would agree with you. if the plans are only to bolt on I/H/E/ECU, the results show so far that a 2.5" exhaust would be more beneficial than a 3" exhaust but i would like to shoot down anyone who says a 3" is too big for n/a applications because it's simply not true. if you plan to upgrade your cams (or if you already have high compression cams, eg jdm k20a) and you tune your car with the right cam angle, then i recommend going for a 3" exhaust. why stop there. i say get upgrade your throttle body and intake manifold as well.

                              the point i was trying to make was the k20 defies common n/a tuning convention. and people shouldn't so easily write off having a 3" or larger exhaust if they can put up with the noise. and guess what... yes it is a 2 litre, four cylinder engine.
                              almost JDM spec, y0!

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Well i am contemplaiting going to a custom 3" system along with a RBC manifold and 70mm throttle body. Main Reason for this is the fact that i am running Spec C Toda Cams and i think the extra intake and exhaust capicty will dramatically increase my top end gains, and considering thats where the power is made in my car it is benificial to my setup.

                                Most of the yanks are using 3" zorst and RBC intake manifold with 64 or 70mm throttle body when running spec 2 or 3 cams and making very good gains....
                                NA is BEST

                                59.4 QR Spint - Qld's Quickest DC5R

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X