Originally posted by N1Spec
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Official Photography Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by N1Spec View PostCanon cant claim class leading noise, DR and image quality anymore now that Nikon went full-frame. D3 is now the class leader for a fraction of the cost
flamesuit on
so yeah.. nikon is leading i guess lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by hebe View PostNikon has it too in the D90 but I think it's only 720p and not 1080p. Dunno how many fps the Canon is in terms of video capture but the D90 is 24fps.sigpicCurrent holder of the Win folder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Didz View Postit wouldnt be over 25. None of the consumer camcorders which ARE FULL HD (that excludes sony and jvc) Record over 25fps or 1080/25p. Which is fine as blu-ray movies are apprently 24pClubITR Team NSX Owner #001 (Berlina Black)
Team Misplaced CT9A Owner #010 - Evo 9 on E85 - Sold
DC2R - Sold
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrThanh View Postit's only a value add. if anyone was serious about recording video i'm sure they'd look elsewheresigpicCurrent holder of the Win folder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrThanh View Postconvenience.
I dunno, i see the convenience as i am a consumer. But if i were a professional photographer i would look at this as nothing more than a gimmick which would never get used. A bit like the camera in mobile phones, even if they are 5mp, the amount of noise is so high that unless in complete sunlight, would look terrible at best.
A better idea from a marketing point of view would be to incorporate this into the entry level DSLR market, to attract more consumers to the DSLR range.sigpicCurrent holder of the Win folder.
Comment
-
that's true. The thought of having to capture video has never crossed my mind as I use my camera, but I guess having it and not using it is cooler than not having it at all. probably just wank factor.
It would be almost useless on a dslr if you're tracking a moving subject (unless af still works somehow), and having to manually zoom etc. sounds like more of a pain in the arse to get working well more than anything else.T U 8 8 Y R - 0 6 5 4 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrThanh View Postthat's true. The thought of having to capture video has never crossed my mind as I use my camera, but I guess having it and not using it is cooler than not having it at all. probably just wank factor.
It would be almost useless on a dslr if you're tracking a moving subject (unless af still works somehow), and having to manually zoom etc. sounds like more of a pain in the arse to get working well more than anything else.
Originally posted by hebe View PostEven the hardcore photographer needs a video capture feature to make his home-made pornossigpicCurrent holder of the Win folder.
Comment
Comment